It's free and works fine for just about any purpose. We didn't always do that, but in light of industry trends and the scalability offered by products like VMWare's, it's entirely feasible and again, performance is roughly equitable to comparable physical hardware.įor the OP: If you are going to use a VM, for a single-user installation, please consider using Sun's VirtualBox. In most cases, they are Citrix servers that host apps and oftentimes multi-user (30+) "full desktop" environments. My company too runs virtualized servers on high-end hardware. Again, this is given appropriate configuration. You won't want to game on it, but productivity apps, MS Office, and even heavy hitters like the Adobe suite are not going to leave you longing for better performance. Given adequate RAM allocation and proper configuration, a virtual machine will perform roughly akin to a comparably equipped physical machine under VMWare Fusion (I haven't tested Parallels since version 3, but reviews I've read seem to rank it very well relative to Fusion). Yes, there is a layer of abstraction when running a virtual machine, but we're not doing emulation or anything particularly taxing that would drag performance down to less than "productive" levels under normal circumstances. Click to expand.I too find that claim a bit zealous.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |